Comments

Mark Fiore does not argue a

Mark Fiore does not argue a issue he just name calls. Just like all liberals he has lost and there is nothing else to do.

Btw- No ones ever heard of you.

I haven't heard any Tea

I haven't heard any Tea Party members make a point on any issue either. If they are so anti-government why do they not protest by refusing to accept their Social Security a program started by another Socialist FDR.

I noticed most are the color of sheep and respond well to the battle cry "Socialist". You realize of course that this is the Master Plan of the Bushes and their desire to promote a New World Order controlled by the Illuminate and the Federal Reserve. They allow the inner city gangs to run wild to keep the sheep in line with fear. You also realize that your credit cards used at rallies allow the government to compile a database for future roundups for the camps that being prepared.

Great Cartoon by the way,

Charlie in Texas, awaiting orders from my Cell Leader.

Are you freaking serious?

Are you freaking serious? The whole point of that video was to satirize Tea Party members who do noting but namecall.

The only way to deal with

The only way to deal with the ignorant garbage being spewed out by the Tea Party is with humor. Thanks, Mark

If that's the case, then how

If that's the case, then how did he win the prize?

IMPEACH b. HUSSEIN obama

IMPEACH b. HUSSEIN obama

on what grounds?

on what grounds?

Hey Mark another word for

Hey Mark another word for "teabag" speech "Impeach" "Impeach" and what about "Rill" (as in real) or "Repill" (for repeal) or just "reload" for *wink,wink* votes!
Yes, we can learn to speak teabag!

Pathetic racist teabagging

Pathetic racist teabagging cowardly loser.

What a waste of time.

What a waste of time. because. the tea party is not going anywhere.They are just now shifting gears.First they take down the libs in Nov. after that we get the big one. you know,2012. So try and try but you will fail fail fail. The genie is out of the bottle. Don't you people ever learn.

Tea party are just plain

Tea party are just plain imbeciles; you , cons, will lose big in Nov and will continue to cry and be even angrier after 2012. I am looking forward to some nice confrontations. We're reloading too!

These folks act as if

These folks act as if America did not try living without many of our laws or social services
But in reality our 1st 100-150 years were just that on a 24 hor basis, but as human natures Horrific abuses of the common people (which is an obvious result when allowing the rich & powerful to do whatever they like
24-7) & if you think its any different in the modern world,
Many of your fellow tea heads are walking prime examples of why the dangers are just as great-
( The example being the modern era's dirt poor 'American Conservative Propaganda victims who sadly walk around all day with their minds having been replaced by endless regurgitation's of recent FOX/GOP & AM Hate Radio broadcasts ,all the while complaining about issues that have absolutely nothing to do with their own situations.
Without laws & control systems , those in a position too, can & will manipulate financial market systems for their own gain regardless of the nations peril until anarchy rules the day.

The thought that the " Leave us alone" system of economics did not already demonstrate its glaring short comings is either spewed from the holes of those who are dying to impose such abuses (The 1% Trillion-ares) or are simply childlike in their ignorance regarding our countries history (Like your hero Glen Beck who creates his own versions of history ) regardless of any pesky facts. (This is why he has to lie about FDR & his efforts to clean up the mess left by the very people who serve as warnings from our past)

What the f--k?

What the f--k?

A Constitutional analogy

A Constitutional analogy that liberals might understand.

Imagine that you and several associates enter into an unbreakable lifetime contract to set up a charity to feed the poor. You set up a charter, a mission statement and establish rules to change the established methods and practices of the charity. You elect an "executor" to carry out the mission of the charity. The charter and contract (which you cannot break) says that you must give 20% of your gross income to the treasury which will then be used to feed the poor. For a time, the executor carries out the duties of his office faithfully, but after a while, in addition to buying food for the poor, he buys firearms for them "so they can protect themselves". Let us say that you disagree with this and resent the fact that your money is going to this purpose. When the executor comes up for election again, he retains his seat, because the majority of the members agree with his "pro gun" rhetoric. The majority does not have enough votes to satisfy the rules for changing the mission statement to include buying guns. So you have a situation where an organization is taking the money of a member and the executor uses that money in a manner that, not only does the member disagree with, but that is outside the authority of the office of that executor to perform. Whether or not the majority agrees with the executor's policy, the executor does not have the authority to act in a manner beyond the written methods and practices of the charity. Would you seek to find a replacement for the executor who has overstepped the authority you gave him to act on your behalf, or would you just sit back, shut up and pay for a policy you disagree with?

This is the situation we constitutional conservatives find ourselves in. The constitution is the charter and rules and the government is the executor. No matter how much any majority wants the government to do a thing, if it falls outside the specific authority that the constitution spells out, It is outside the authority of government to act.

Your attempt at an analogy

Your attempt at an analogy fails in total due to your total lack of understanding of the Constitution, its foundations and the intent of the Founding Fathers. The Founding Fathers were not 'conservatives' in anyway.

There are somethings I will admit that President Obama, unfortunately like his war criminal and Constitutional trampling predessor did before him, has continued. He has kept GITMO open, he has continued illegal rendition and wiretaps, he has continued two illegal wars; but I did not see any of you so called 'Constitutional conservatives' say anything about those major actions when the Bush crime family and RICO organization and war profiteers were in office.

Had you and your ilk been alive in 1776 you would had the mantle of "Tory" and sold out the Founding Fathers and their families and supporters.

your comments are

your comments are hillarious. You are a tea bagger.! LOL

Section 8 - Powers of

Section 8 - Powers of Congress
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States

Truth is, the Constitution is pretty vague, and highly open to interpretation. So I don't know how claiming to drape your side of the argument in this document is relevant. Because right there it says it has the right to take care of the "general Welfare" of the country; whatever that means is open to interpretation by the people of the country, who speak through their representatives. It's imperfect and nobody gets exactly what they want, but everybody gets a little bit of something they need, and hopefully it makes all of our lives a little bit better.

I'm not the author you were

I'm not the author you were responding too but I thought I should make a point. If you read further into section 8, it gives a list of items do which I interpret as items congress can as part of "promoting the general welfare". So the question really is, can congress make a law regarding something that isn't on that list because it’s a separate paragraph and thus a separate thought or is the whole section supposed to be taken together as one organized statement?

Personally I think it’s fairly obvious that our founding fathers meant it as one organized statement to be taken as a whole and not "pick and choose" where to stop in the section. However this has been the discussion since our country's creation and so long as people have an agenda, they will do what they can to support their beliefs regardless of which side the issue they are on. That’s why IMO the 10th amendment is one of the most over looked yet one of the most important amendments to the constitution. It gives the people and states the power to keep the federal government in check.

What many I have spoken with seen to forget is we are a representative republic not a democracy. The envisioned structure was the states answer to the people and the federal government answers to the states with the federal government existing only to protect the states from each other, from foreign powers, and to guarantee individual freedom's/rights couldn't be taken away. Getting away from this structure IMO is part of the reason there are so many problems in general within our government today.

Anyway like I said it’s just my opinion I just wanted to pose the question regarding the constitution as I did above.

Yes, these "teabag" types

Yes, these "teabag" types are unfit to be fellow citizens, or vote for our leaders, but unfortunately there seem to be a lot of them. Mostly in the South. How about we cut them loose, let them have their own country their own way, and also pay the 7 trillion dollar bill they racked up during the reign of the murderous war criminal G. W. Bush? We could probably get Universal Healthcare going up North here within the year if we get rid of the nutjobs. We should start a program that encourages the greedy right-wing nutjobs to move to Florida and Texas. The zero state income taxes down there should appeal to their greed (nevermind the lack of public services, they like that!). Say, how much would Mexico pay us for Texas, anyway? Would it repay for Iraq, the tax cuts for the rich, and the bailouts? We could throw in Florida, maybe Mexico and Cuba could split the cost, divvy up the land, and we could give them a 30-year mortgage on it (heh heh, how apropos)...

Absolutely. Let's just say

Absolutely. Let's just say to them, "You know what happened at Appomattox Courthouse? Our bad. We're sorry. You all just go ahead and go, OK? And don't let the door hit you on the way out."

Brilliant!

Brilliant!

I love you, Mark. Thank you

I love you, Mark. Thank you for bringing humor to what up until now I have found as a completely depressing devolution of our national "values." It makes me feel sick to my stomach that these people consider themselves patriotic... psychotic maybe, but patriotic- not a chance. The violent nature of some of the commentaries here illustrate that. It feels very liberating to be able to laugh at how crazy our Country can be. Thank you so much.

The truly sad thing is that

The truly sad thing is that the tea-baggers reveal just how uneducated and illiterate our nation's citizens have become. These people do not have an inkling of what the Founding Fathers stood for, of the philosophy behind the Constitution and Bill of Rights, or the dire need that they saw for separation of church and state. If these tea-baggers and the rest of the current so called 'conservatives' were alive in 1776 they would have been called 'Tory' and they would have sided with Benedict Arnold and the British. Their posture is one akin to supporting aristocracy, something the Founding Fathers hated with a passion.

good stuff... right on

good stuff...
right on target!

Hilarious! I especially

Hilarious! I especially love the angry and muttering teabag at the beginning.

Video

Video Response
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZDZzbUxrnM
Geithner Needs Your Help!!!

your sure get a lot of

your sure get a lot of opinionated, one eyed people commenting on here...their comments are almost as funny as you

Hilarious

Hilarious

just because it is animated,

just because it is animated, has bright colors & has a condescending soundtrack complete with a lame laugh track does not automatically qualify a cartoon as funny no matter what the topic. unfortunately, this is true of this "tea bag" cartoon. it is a snide, shallow, swipe at humor that deprives fiore's fans of his usual wit. it's almost like he felt obliged to do a "tea bag" item and this was his half-hearted offering.

seriously, this was a sad, intellectually inept, humorless effort...yawn...

Lack of wit.totally

Lack of wit.totally simplistic.no sarcasm.just plumb stupid cartoon.

The so-called conservatives

The so-called conservatives who are objecting to this must not listen to the nasty, mostly unfounded sack of crap coming from the mouths of the hundreds of conservative talk show hosts each day. This is funny. None of the crap coming from Limburger, Ins-Hannity, Laura, etc.etc. etc. is even remotely funny. It's just small minded paranoia, feeding small-minded paranoids so they keep buying their small-minded, selfish, un-Christian thoughts in any form profitable.
Repuglicans and neo-ConJobs are like school yard bullies; they can dish it out, but cry like babies when someone stands up to them.
Three cheers Fiore!

Actually, your statement

Actually, your statement about "neo-conjobs" seems directly aimed at members of the Jewish community, as predominately "neo-conservative" titular thinkers have been Jewish. Is this because you're actually a Nazi? I think so, I think the Democratic party is just a bunch of Nazis in disguise! No really, you're just arrogant fools. Conservatives do have a sense of humour, it kicks in every time we look at stuff people like you say and DON'T fly into a fit of violent rage resulting in permanent bodily harm to you for OBVIOUSLY hating Jews. I mean cmon, you're a Nazi. Right? (Cue cry-fest over how mean conservatives are and just call you nazis and socialists all the time) Oh ya, socialist. NAZI. NATIONAL-SOCIALIST?? Lol, funny thing is, it's doubtful that you'd know what a Neo-Conservative is (Hint, its not actually a political party, more of an internal joke term used by about 3 people then later used as a derogatory term used by the christian religious right as a code-word for Jewish Republican party members who were once liberals and definately not "one of us[christians]")... or why you'd hate them (The 5.2 Neo-Conservatives in the world) ? Even funnier, George W. Bush was NOT a neo-conservative, he was never a liberal first, he never got "mugged by reality" and only a handful (about 3 total including Cheney's) of his aides were.
The funniest joke of all is liberals acting like they know politics rambling about conspiracy theories and making cute sound-a-like names for conservative pundits (who even we conservatives find annoying) ;)

You don't hear anything like

You don't hear anything like this coming from the conservative talking repugnants because they really don't have a fully developed sense of humor and only see the world as black and white.

I'd rather be sucking on the

I'd rather be sucking on the governments b--s than taking their d--k in the a-- . . . keep bending over America and watch what happens! Does your low opinion of Americans fighting for their rights translate to gay activists and hyphenated americans? Oh wait . . . let me guess, that question makes me a racist homophobe???

Gary Kleppe's picture

No, it just makes you

No, it just makes you utterly clueless. The problem with tea-baggers isn't that they want to fight for their rights. It's that they're so disconnected from reality that they wouldn't know a real threat to their rights if it danced up and down singing "threats to rights are here again".

Fiore sees hate and

Fiore sees hate and hatefully tosses 'jokes' around. Now hate is funny, see!
Would you like fries with that?

All Tea Baggers want is to

All Tea Baggers want is to live in a country that:

(1) has NO Income Tax, or any other taxes
(2) has NO gun laws !
(3) the government is not passing stupid health care laws

Fortunately, such a country exists !

It is called Somolia.

I suggest all Tea Baggers move there immediately !

Wonderful ! Could not have

Wonderful ! Could not have said it better. Thanks.

no, we want to live in a

no, we want to live in a country where the government protects our RIGHTS against the WANTS or even the NEEDS of others.

The function of government is to protect the rights of the individual, not take care of his needs. That is the responsibility of the individual.

You epitomize the failure of

You epitomize the failure of our educational system, or maybe not, maybe you dropped out of school at about 3rd grade like Palin and Bachmann.

excellent remark and to the

excellent remark and to the point

All tea baggers are smarter

All tea baggers are smarter than you.

The worst part probably is

The worst part probably is that this guy is sitting there waiting for comments as a total narcissist. I remember in school watching professors look sadly on cartoons that can never truly rise to the level of being art.

This stuff is just more liberal media rubbish off the same assembly line that produced "Mama voted for Obama," (red line underneath "Obama" Ironically, technology is still not accepting Obama) National Enslavement of the Arts Propaganda movement, etc. There are lots of flashy colors, I am noticing at the sidebar where it says: "Torture US Troops." Mark is sadly stuck on Bush.

I'm surprised that San Francisco hasn't fallen into the pacific ocean already, or been burned to the ground. Perhaps this is the only website which is operated from an airliner restroom over Detroit. Oh, well it is in fact the same motivation at its core.

I think the worst part is

I think the worst part is that your rant lacked any cohesive points.

The artist is a narcissist stuck on Bush?
National Enslavement of the Arts Propaganda movement?
San Francisco falling into the sea?

Wow! I have to say that your most impressive transition was from SF to an 'airliner restroom over Detroit'. Left we wanting more (or at least, what the hell you were talking about!)

Oboobma's schemes to destroy

Oboobma's schemes to destroy America will fail. Give me liberty or give me death!

If you want liberty then

If you want liberty then join us liberals and the ACLU. Say NO to government reading of emails and phone calls, to torture of other human beings, to the recent gift to corporations of "personhood" so they can buy elections and congresspersons, and fight against those who would deny women the right of control of their bodies by making it nearly impossible to choose a legal abortion. You want liberty? Join with us.

Time to withdraw funding for

Time to withdraw funding for public radio and web sites such as this. Isn't it ironic that tax payer money is being wasted to ridicule the people who are complaining about wasted tax money? Mark Fiore, aren't you ashamed of yourself for being part of the problem? Or are you just to happy to be making a crap load of cash while the left cheers you on? No need to answer.

When the morons began to

When the morons began to call them selves "tea baggers" all bets were off. How could they not know that this term was already defined? Really, in my mind it is the biggest joke of the decade. Hey, I have a tea bag for ya! Come on over, we can have a tea party! Cheers!

Anderson Cooper and the

Anderson Cooper and the "morons" at MSNBC used the sexual term "tea baggers" to be crude and dismissive of the protesters.

The people protesting the government grab to takeover private businesses (including the financials, automotive and health care industries) and protesting the severe taxation of a small group of Americans to pay for these and other government programs call themselves the TEA PARTY, but you knew that.

A rigged game In some

A rigged game

In some industries, rigging the game is called collusion. In our nation, where we're looking at corporate entities obtaining civil rights akin to individual rights, it's about extreme power differential.

Pure profit motive and predatory capitalism should not be the model for our healthcare. This type if ethos falls far short and the ironic bit is those who expolit systms make enough where they seldom have to deal with their own systems' shortcomings.

It's a rigged game and many on the right are playing classic tricks of misdirection with financially driven hidden agendas- stuff that has little to do with the many loaded words used at will (liberty, justice, freedom).

The systems seem to rule, just like the corporations. Hell, I work for the entropic governmen- but who else can put the brakes on? Granted, they're as dirty (both sides) as anyone else, but how else are you gonna fix things?

Oh sure, it's easy to scream Socialist- especially when certain pretend news channels are feeding the hate, their corporate sponsors fearing losing billions. The worst of it is what happens if those they stir run amok- to the point that Conservative leaders can't even control them?

BTW- ain't it funny the Right goes on and on about people sponging off the systems of care when this is a pittance considering the $$$ corporations make off of an extremely rigged game? Kinda like the Right's repugnance at evolutionary theory but marriage to social darwinism when it comes to healthcare.

For teabaggers, it doesn't have to make sense, just yell loudly, inflate your numbers, and carry a BIG STICK (compensation for a short stick, perhaps?)...

Post new comment

  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Filtered words will be replaced with the filtered version of the word.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.